Thursday 26 July 2018

Rose Wylie on tv and in Penzance and Newlyn.

Watching Alan Yentob talking to Rose Wylie , who at 83 is having sucess as an artist. She is just as I would have imagined, a terribly middle class bohemian, messy, speaking in that perilously well educated quiet way. I am expecting not to find out how she became successful. She has a lot of space and therefore works big. How did she get a show at the Serpentine?

Her drawing is very rough and childlike, no attempt to observe closely, repetitious cliches of pink square heads. She collages on top, writes words on, uses memory.
Germaine Greer speaks well of her. She was married to a painter who has died, and she brought up children, only later going to the Royal college and having time to paint, using unstretched  canvas and working on several pictures at once.
The crude drawing is a bit like Guston? A bit early Hockney?


She says nothing about her relationship with her husband Roy Oxlade.
She wears lipstick and has her hair carefully styled.


So, I can't say I really like Wylie's  work, it's unpleasant, derivative of films without saying anything, it's clumsily faux naive and it's been taken up with ridiculous enthusiasm.

It has a certain vitality but it's tedious, slapdash, self indulgent and Yentob has not asked anything very difficult.

I am of course envious of her sucess. It's rather terribly emperor's new clothes.Must go and see the two local shows of her work so I can speak with more authority about what the pictures are like at firsthand.

X.    X

So, just returned from her two shows at The Exchange in Penzance and at Newlyn.
It's nice to be able to see paintings here that are currently in the art news.
They are big, the unstretched canvas is glued on to stretched canvasses and you can see where the staples were that the artist used to tack the canvas to her wall.
I notice the comment book has many enthusiastic comments about her vision being like a child's, but, but....I want to ask why Wylie likes this faux naivety. I don't like it, the lack of observation, the use of Nazi uniformed figures, the crudity.

One picture with its recall of wartime aeroplanes and dogs below gave me a feeling of Rose using authentic memories but many of the works were not so interesting. 

If they were done smaller by an artist without her connections who would give them gallery space?



If she is to be congratulated on success in the art world purely because she is old isn't that condescending?
I couldn't stand more than two minutes of watching her painting a wobbly blue line but maybe the rest of the over an hour long film about her was more compelling.

How will oil paint on raw canvas survive the ravages of time? 
Does it matter?
 I have a feeling there's only room for one Rose Wylie, that others with her cack handed badly drawn cartoonish figures will not fare so well. 

She's having a ball, enjoying creating images and being courted as if she's the new Basquiat, who she admires, but I suppose it's like marmite, if the taste grates and the novelty isn't impressing you you have to leave it to those that contemplate Wylie's work with relish.




1 comment:

  1. I agree with your observations and opinions Mary. She comes across as utterly self-absorbed and tedious. I really struggled to watch the programme and couldn't bear the way the critics and curators were fawning over her. Nothing pleasing or admirable about any of her work!

    ReplyDelete